Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imma Be
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Imma Be (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The article Imma Be should be deleted due to several reasons. The article has no reliable sources that state that it's unknown if any of the content is true, the article gets poor views per month and it only contains rumors, so none of the content is real BittersweetJoJo (talk) 21:41, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No verifiable info yet, should've been released already if it were to have been released. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No reliable sources confirming the release of the said single. A redirect to the album article is also not a bad idea, iff there is evidence that the song is part of the new album. LeaveSleaves 05:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep/Redirect. A snippet has been leaked so there is a good chance that it could be the next single (the snippet is given as reference in the article) but it still is unknown... So i think it should stay but be redirected to the album, for now. 10:49, 5 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.160.195.153 (talk)
- Delete. Reads like pure speculation, no proper sources, nuke it. tomasz. 15:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - currently speculation, and contains no references to reliable sources. Terraxos (talk) 02:34, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Abecedare (talk) 02:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.